Posts by decodedigital
Briefing Note: Forensic DNA in Sexual Assault Cases
DNA evidence in sexual assault prosecutions is often presented as conclusive and highly compelling evidence, but there are serious scientific and legal limitations. Defence lawyers should be alert to the following issues when preparing or challenging such cases.
Read MoreClient charged with sexual assault? How to challenge the evidence
Understanding the Limitations of DNA Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases Sexual assault evidence is often very complex, yet the way we see it reported by Government Service providers is very factual and often does not disclose the limitations of the evidence. This lack of disclosure may present the evidence in a misleading manner, which means…
Read MoreWhat Your DNA Report Doesn’t Tell You
And things you need to find out
Read MoreA Victorian Police Officer Pleads Guilty to Falsifying Forensic Evidence
Conviction of Detective Symes Raises Concerns Over Evidence Integrity The recent conviction of Victorian police officer Detective Symes for falsifying evidence has raised serious concerns about the integrity of evidence handling within law enforcement. This case serves as a stark reminder of the critical need for lawyers to ensure that evidence is subjected to independent…
Read MoreWho Remembers the Vincent Report?
The Vincent Report and the Wrongful Conviction of Fara Jama The Vincent Report, released in 2010, was commissioned to identify forensic failures that led to the wrongful conviction of Fara Jama. The report following the Inquiry emphasises the need for rigorous standards and oversight in forensic science, particularly regarding DNA evidence. While DNA analysis has…
Read MoreScientific studies have now demonstrated DNA transfer by dogs and cats
Animals as DNA Reservoirs and Vectors of DNA Transfer The results of these scientific studies indicate that animals can act as reservoirs of human DNA and vectors for human DNA transfer that may need to be considered during evaluative DNA reporting. Furthermore, if an interaction between an animal and a perpetrator is suspected, consideration should…
Read MoreDNA Falsehoods
False Information About DNA Transfer Being Provided to Lawyers DNA Experts have been providing information to lawyers about trace transfer that is outright false. Concerning Trends in DNA Transfer Misinterpretation As recently as last week, I was involved in a matter where the Government DNA expert told a barrister in a pre-trial conference that the…
Read MoreA successful motion to exclude DNA evidence analysed outside laboratory protocol.
Case Background A DNA sample was collected from a firearm seized in a vehicle stop for the purposes of DNA testing. A mixed DNA profile was obtained from the DNA analysis process. STRmix was used to deconvolute and statistically evaluate the DNA profile. The analysis of this DNA profile was subject to a motion to…
Read MoreR v Umatia – Appeal granted despite the limitations to forensic evidence being disclosed.
Case Background Mr Umatia was initially convicted of two counts of sexual assault and one count of rape following an allegation that he picked up the intoxicated complainant in his vehicle in the belief he was an Uber driver and was giving her a free lift home. It is alleged that the Defendant stopped the…
Read MoreThe Uncertainty Surrounding Saliva Testing
Forensic testing for the presence of saliva is by far the most problematic of the forensic tests available. Understanding Saliva Testing in Forensic Investigations Have you ever seen the following in a forensic statement or report? “Possible saliva was detected” “A test for amylase was positive” This means only a presumptive or screening test has…
Read MoreComplexities of Biological Testing in Sexual Assault Matters
Biological Fluid Testing in Sexual Assault Matters Biological fluid testing in sexual assault matters is often not as black and white as lawyers would like. In the last of this series on testing for biological fluids, we are covering the detection of semen. Understanding Presumptive Tests for Semen Have you ever seen the following in…
Read MoreBlood or not blood? That is the question.
Is the Failure to Disclose the Limitations of Forensic Testing Giving Rise to Misleading Evidence? Understanding Presumptive Blood Tests Have you ever seen the following in a forensic statement or report? “A presumptive test for the presence of blood was positive” “Apparent blood was detected”? This means only a presumptive or screening test has been…
Read MoreSecondary DNA transfer quashes conviction
Seifeddine v R: DNA Evidence of the Accused Was Found on the Trigger of a Gun. Case closed? Not quite. Case Background Mr Seifeddine was a part-time worker at a cafe where a search warrant at the premises located a number of firearms held in a bucket, which had been secreted in a wall cavity.…
Read MoreThe Simple Mistake Lawyers Make with DNA Evidence
Introducing the “Prosecutor’s Fallacy”: The Simple Mistake Lawyers (and the Media) Commonly Make When ‘Interpreting’ DNA Results Can You Identify the Issue in This Statement? “It is 100 million times more likely if Mr X is a contributor to the DNA profile than if another unknown individual from the Australian population is.” This is an…
Read MoreDeciphering common terms in DNA reports, and what they mean
What Does It All Mean? Deciphering the Scientific Gibberish to Get the Answers You Need – Did They, or Did They Not Contribute DNA?! Quick Summary DNA testing is not an exact science—while your job (and ours) would be a lot easier with DNA reports that provided a simple yes or no as to whether…
Read MoreThe fallibility of Likelihood Ratios – when to question them in DNA reports.
Summary In a courtroom, jurors and judges can be easily swayed by impressive-sounding DNA evidence and often do not pay attention to, or understand, the statistical evaluation. As a Criminal Lawyer, knowing when and how to question DNA results is key to maximising their efficacy in your case. A red flag is seeing low statistical…
Read MoreTop 5 Tips: Preparing to Cross Examine an Expert Witness (Part 1).
Top 5 Tips: Preparing to Cross-Examine an Expert Witness (Part 1) DNA is very persuasive to juries. It is often erroneously considered an absolute science, from juries, lawyers and even judges. But DNA evidence is easily misunderstood, often has undue weight placed on it, and often comes with undisclosed limitations. It is imperative lawyers understand…
Read MoreTop 5 Tips: Questioning an Expert Witness (Part 2)
Summary DNA evidence is highly persuasive; however, it is common for the limitations of the science not to be disclosed in the courtroom, resulting in undue weight being placed on the evidence or even miscarriages of justice. DNA evidence is a science, and as such, there should be a scientific explanation for every comment coming…
Read MoreLawyers: Forensic light sources are always a screening tool and never evidence.
Key Takeaways: Hollywood Has a Lot to Answer For Hollywood has contributed to the widespread belief that forensic light sources used at crime scenes are infallible tools for identifying biological fluids. Unfortunately, this belief has taken hold even in modern courtrooms, where statements like the below are becoming more frequent: “I conducted an examination of…
Read MoreDo You Know What Your Report Means?
The Importance of Understanding Forensic Biology Reports This week I was contacted by a barrister who was two weeks into a three-week trial. Unfortunately, because of the way the forensic biology report was written, he completely misunderstood the forensic biology and DNA evidence in his matter. I worked closely with this barrister to put him…
Read More